Manchester City Forums

This is a discussion forum for Manchester City Football Club fans
It is currently Mon Apr 29, 2024 2:38 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 10:40 pm 
Offline
Junior Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:43 am
Posts: 474
It's a fantastic testement to the guy's all-round ability that he's capable of doing the job in the 3 positions mentioned. Such versatility will be invaluable come the mid season conjestion of fixtures, given the guys insatiable desire to play.

Personally i believe RB gets the most out of his abilities, as while he isn't a fantastic crosser, he has the ability to beat a man - as much to do with his strength as his speed - and loves to cut inside, playing balls along the ground. With Jo being a bit of a poacher, this could suit his game too.

Corluka's physicality and calmness on the ball could then be utilised in the middle of defence.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 11:46 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 11:57 am
Posts: 11646
Location: Leeds/Manchester
Picto wrote:
It's a fantastic testement to the guy's all-round ability that he's capable of doing the job in the 3 positions mentioned. Such versatility will be invaluable come the mid season conjestion of fixtures, given the guys insatiable desire to play.

Personally i believe RB gets the most out of his abilities, as while he isn't a fantastic crosser, he has the ability to beat a man - as much to do with his strength as his speed - and loves to cut inside, playing balls along the ground. With Jo being a bit of a poacher, this could suit his game too.

Corluka's physicality and calmness on the ball could then be utilised in the middle of defence.


Conker fully. Stick Corluka in the middle and give Richards a run around as a wing back, can't be too much of a disastrous decision?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 1:38 am 
Offline
Junior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 3:34 am
Posts: 4937
Location: Toronto, Canada
Charlie wasn't bad when he played some games as holding midfielder (last season), not a bad idea giving him the chance again. Any opinions?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 1:44 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 1:38 am
Posts: 11713
Location: Perth, Western Australia
corluka is better served in defense as is micah with them 2 and dunnie we have one of the better defenses around. just buy a midfielder and leave the roaster where he belongs.

_________________
Posting Bi-Monthly These Days

I was born with "
methemoglobinemia"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 1:57 am 
Offline
Junior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 3:34 am
Posts: 4937
Location: Toronto, Canada
Miggs V3 wrote:
corluka is better served in defense as is micah with them 2 and dunnie we have one of the better defenses around. just buy a midfielder and leave the roaster where he belongs.


give me some names?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 2:46 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 1:38 am
Posts: 11713
Location: Perth, Western Australia
annan, sweep, bentley, gattuso, riquelme

_________________
Posting Bi-Monthly These Days

I was born with "
methemoglobinemia"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 3:00 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 1:38 am
Posts: 11713
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Joaquin
Deisler (out of retirement)
Luque
Mancini
Maniche
Luis Garcia

_________________
Posting Bi-Monthly These Days

I was born with "
methemoglobinemia"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 9:14 am 
Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 2:50 pm
Posts: 64
If his all around passing game isn't so good, then playing him at right back would also be ineffective. Sure he'd be great going forward, but wouldn't he just misplace/overhit his crosses into the box?

As good as he is going forward, i can't think of too many goals he's scored or set up that haven't come from a set piece

I think he'd be perfect for the ball winning midfielder. Makelele isn't a great passer. Vieira wasn't exactly pinpoint with his passing neither. Both still dominated the midfield. So long as we have somebody with great technical ability alongside him, i really don't see the problem with trying it.

Even if it doesn't work, kudos to Hughes for at least trying something new.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 9:25 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 1:38 am
Posts: 11713
Location: Perth, Western Australia
diarra would be a great signing,

_________________
Posting Bi-Monthly These Days

I was born with "
methemoglobinemia"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 9:29 am 
Offline
Junior Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 5:54 pm
Posts: 4161
Location: God's own county
ono wrote:
If his all around passing game isn't so good, then playing him at right back would also be ineffective. Sure he'd be great going forward, but wouldn't he just misplace/overhit his crosses into the box?

As good as he is going forward, i can't think of too many goals he's scored or set up that haven't come from a set piece

I think he'd be perfect for the ball winning midfielder. Makelele isn't a great passer. Vieira wasn't exactly pinpoint with his passing neither. Both still dominated the midfield. So long as we have somebody with great technical ability alongside him, i really don't see the problem with trying it.

Even if it doesn't work, kudos to Hughes for at least trying something new.


When Micah played at right back for us in the distant days of having a natural right winger he was excellent, and I think we've missed his pace on the right. It's also the position which brought him to the attention of the England set up, and over all impressed everybody.

I just can't see Micah as a midfielder, or rather as an attacking midfielder due to his ball distribution. Yes he could play the 'Hamann role', but by doing that were not really utilising his strengths, plus again you'd have to question his distribution.

On top of all that, if Hughes does look to mould him into a midfielder, the poor lad could see his short term England career go up the spout.

_________________
Joeyyyyyyyyyyyyyy


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 9:30 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 1:38 am
Posts: 11713
Location: Perth, Western Australia
ESM wrote:
When Micah played at right back for us in the distant days of having a natural right winger he was excellent, and I think we've missed his pace on the right. It's also the position which brought him to the attention of the England set up, and over all impressed everybody.

I just can't see Micah as a midfielder, or rather as an attacking midfielder due to his ball distribution. Yes he could play the 'Hamann role', but by doing that were not really utilising his strengths, plus again you'd have to question his distribution.

On top of all that, if Hughes does look to mould him into a midfielder, the poor lad could see his short term England career go up the spout.


hmm... hate to say it but i agree with you esm

_________________
Posting Bi-Monthly These Days

I was born with "
methemoglobinemia"


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group