| Manchester City Forums http://www.mancityforum.co.uk/forum/ |
|
| James Milner http://www.mancityforum.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=9975 |
Page 1 of 3 |
| Author: | kippax_in_my_blood [ Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | James Milner |
Before tonights england friendly vs italia, he didn't have his own thread, but tonight he does, and im saying it... Im saying this... James milner is hard as fucking nails yep thats where im at...he took a brutal kick to the point of the chin, full force from the point of a boot, went down for a few seconds, got up brushed himself down and got on with the match....... 
|
|
| Author: | Bastard [ Wed Aug 15, 2012 10:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: James Milner |
You'd have him kimbo. |
|
| Author: | Noel Gallagher's PA [ Wed Aug 15, 2012 10:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: James Milner |
he's a tough little fucker alright. and hard working too. Remember the 6-1?? of course you do, he had two assists I think. worked hard as fuck down that flank giving good cover to richards to power forward. Richards got MOTM but Milner could just have done so too (as could many). That was one of the things Micah said about him once, that if he was playing on his side, he would always know he would track back and cover. Good game v Chelsea too in the shield. Never complained about not starting too often at the back end of last season either #respect |
|
| Author: | Gobby [ Wed Aug 15, 2012 11:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: James Milner |
Was it last season or before that his head was split open, blood pissing out, goes off and gets it taped up, runs back on and kills it. Yeah, love that man. |
|
| Author: | gibbonicus_andronicus [ Wed Aug 15, 2012 11:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: James Milner |
he posts here as well, good man. |
|
| Author: | kippax_in_my_blood [ Thu Aug 16, 2012 7:04 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: James Milner |
gibbonicus_andronicus wrote: he posts here as well, good man. What?....really. Under what name......bassmans left bollock. |
|
| Author: | DarloBlue [ Thu Aug 16, 2012 7:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: James Milner |
kippax_in_my_blood wrote: gibbonicus_andronicus wrote: he posts here as well, good man. What?....really. Under what name......bassmans left bollock. jcwilson |
|
| Author: | Danny's Studs [ Thu Aug 16, 2012 8:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: James Milner |
DarloBlue wrote: kippax_in_my_blood wrote: gibbonicus_andronicus wrote: he posts here as well, good man. What?....really. Under what name......bassmans left bollock. jcwilson Fuck me you have a good memory. Yeh, Jimmy is terrific player. |
|
| Author: | NoddytheAdlingtonBlue [ Thu Aug 16, 2012 8:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: James Milner |
jcwilsn1 innit? |
|
| Author: | Gobby [ Thu Aug 16, 2012 8:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: James Milner |
There's definitely a number somewhere in there. |
|
| Author: | NoddytheAdlingtonBlue [ Thu Aug 16, 2012 8:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: James Milner |
Talking of numbers; have any squad numbers been announced for the new season? Any changes? |
|
| Author: | gibbonicus_andronicus [ Thu Aug 16, 2012 8:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: James Milner |
hart is going from 25 to 1 |
|
| Author: | NoddytheAdlingtonBlue [ Thu Aug 16, 2012 8:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: James Milner |
Looking on the OS it seems Nasri has taken No 8 with Skol relegated to 6 |
|
| Author: | Danny's Studs [ Thu Aug 16, 2012 9:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: James Milner |
NoddytheAdlingtonBlue wrote: Looking on the OS it seems Nasri has taken No 8 with Skol relegated to 6 Apparently Weaver lives near Skol, and the fucker is fat as fuck and out drinking every night. Now, agreed, Weaver isn't on the same trust level of source as say a Roget's Thesaurus or Oxford Dictionary but if it is true, which I tend to believe it is, it doesn't bode well. |
|
| Author: | South East Citizen [ Thu Aug 16, 2012 9:21 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: James Milner |
How does Weaver know he's out drinking every night unless she's out drinking every night? We're to take the word of a lush? |
|
| Author: | Danny's Studs [ Thu Aug 16, 2012 9:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: James Milner |
South East Citizen wrote: How does Weaver know he's out drinking every night unless she's out drinking every night? We're to take the word of a lush? Yeh, further to that she's not really a drinker, so there has to be an allowance for a) female rumour gabber b) I don't trust people that don't drink a lot c) she's a City fan and will sensationalise anything d) it's Weaver. So, with a coefficient of variation at (pool size 100 lies/truths); math | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- socst | .4751335 .052017 9.13 0.000 .372555 .577712 ~cons| 27.74563 2.782287 9.97 0.000 22.25891 33.23235 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ quietly summarize math di 100 * e(rmse) / r(mean) 14.964052 Laboratory report: Inconclusive. With this high a CV we have zero chance of interpreting truth. 
|
|
| Author: | South East Citizen [ Thu Aug 16, 2012 9:31 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: James Milner |
7 minutes is a very decent turnaround for that post 
|
|
| Author: | gibbonicus_andronicus [ Thu Aug 16, 2012 11:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: James Milner |
Danny's Studs wrote: South East Citizen wrote: How does Weaver know he's out drinking every night unless she's out drinking every night? We're to take the word of a lush? Yeh, further to that she's not really a drinker, so there has to be an allowance for a) female rumour gabber b) I don't trust people that don't drink a lot c) she's a City fan and will sensationalise anything d) it's Weaver. So, with a coefficient of variation at (pool size 100 lies/truths); math | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- socst | .4751335 .052017 9.13 0.000 .372555 .577712 ~cons| 27.74563 2.782287 9.97 0.000 22.25891 33.23235 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ quietly summarize math di 100 * e(rmse) / r(mean) 14.964052 Laboratory report: Inconclusive. With this high a CV we have zero chance of interpreting truth.
|
|
| Author: | kippax_in_my_blood [ Thu Aug 16, 2012 4:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: James Milner |
Danny's Studs wrote: South East Citizen wrote: How does Weaver know he's out drinking every night unless she's out drinking every night? We're to take the word of a lush? Yeh, further to that she's not really a drinker, so there has to be an allowance for a) female rumour gabber b) I don't trust people that don't drink a lot c) she's a City fan and will sensationalise anything d) it's Weaver. So, with a coefficient of variation at (pool size 100 lies/truths); math | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- socst | .4751335 .052017 9.13 0.000 .372555 .577712 ~cons| 27.74563 2.782287 9.97 0.000 22.25891 33.23235 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ quietly summarize math di 100 * e(rmse) / r(mean) 14.964052 Laboratory report: Inconclusive. With this high a CV we have zero chance of interpreting truth. Is the answer ....errr roger..  
|
|
| Author: | jcwilsn1 [ Mon Aug 20, 2012 4:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: James Milner |
gibbonicus_andronicus wrote: he posts here as well, good man. Thought i'd stop by and say hello. I don't have the wherewithal to chat with everyone in the off-season, but I'm back. If any game in the season, the one against southhampton at home would have been the one to test out the 3-5-2. I wonder what Robert was thinking. |
|
| Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|