Manchester City Forums
http://www.mancityforum.co.uk/forum/

"Legends" that are actually a bit shit.
http://www.mancityforum.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=12648
Page 2 of 4

Author:  Bastard [ Thu Mar 26, 2015 9:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: "Legends" that are actually a bit shit.

O Blue wrote:
I'll add Wes Anderson while I'm at it. His movies are stupid and pointless.



:mad:

YOU'RE stupid and pointless!

:(

I love Wes Anderson films! But then I'm a right soft cunt. :o

Author:  O Blue [ Thu Mar 26, 2015 9:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: "Legends" that are actually a bit shit.

Bastard wrote:
O Blue wrote:
I'll add Wes Anderson while I'm at it. His movies are stupid and pointless.



:mad:

YOU'RE stupid and pointless!

:(

I love Wes Anderson films! But then I'm a right soft cunt. :o


Image

anyway... back to the topic.

#8 Depeche Mode. Why do people like them :confusion-shrug:

Author:  Jesus O'Nazareth [ Fri Mar 27, 2015 6:24 am ]
Post subject:  Re: "Legends" that are actually a bit shit.

Mostly because they're Germans, the fans that is, or wannabe Germans.

#9 Red Hot Chilli Peppers.

Author:  Bastard [ Fri Mar 27, 2015 11:33 am ]
Post subject:  Re: "Legends" that are actually a bit shit.

Jesus O'Nazareth wrote:
wannabe Germans.


I'm getting a right hammering in here.

#12 Gavin and Stacey
#13 The Inbetweeners

Author:  Danny's Studs [ Fri Mar 27, 2015 12:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: "Legends" that are actually a bit shit.

RHCP are shit. No question.

I like both;

Gav and stace and The Inbetweeners.

Wes Anderson films are garbage. I have failed to see the interest.

Kubrick is still gold.

I'll add to the list Tom Cruise. Prize cunt.

Author:  NoddytheAdlingtonBlue [ Fri Mar 27, 2015 11:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: "Legends" that are actually a bit shit.

Benny

/thread

Author:  KickerConspiracy [ Sat Mar 28, 2015 9:55 am ]
Post subject:  Re: "Legends" that are actually a bit shit.

#14 Sting.

Author:  Jesus O'Nazareth [ Sat Mar 28, 2015 3:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: "Legends" that are actually a bit shit.

#Foo Fighters.


The world is still full of foo.

Author:  kippax_in_my_blood [ Sat Mar 28, 2015 5:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: "Legends" that are actually a bit shit.

depeche mode...now come on, thats a bit much..

Tom jones...

Author:  KickerConspiracy [ Sun Mar 29, 2015 4:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: "Legends" that are actually a bit shit.

#William Shakespeare.

Author:  O Blue [ Sun Mar 29, 2015 4:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: "Legends" that are actually a bit shit.

Neil Gaiman. His books are terrible. He's like the Wes Anderson of writers. I'm always suckered into watching/reading and end of going 'what the fuck was the point of all that?!'

Author:  South East Citizen [ Sun Mar 29, 2015 10:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: "Legends" that are actually a bit shit.

Muhammad Ali.

Author:  Danny's Studs [ Sun Mar 29, 2015 11:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re:

South East Citizen wrote:
Muhammad Ali.


Explain yourself?

Author:  South East Citizen [ Mon Mar 30, 2015 1:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Re:

Danny's Studs wrote:
South East Citizen wrote:
Muhammad Ali.


Explain yourself?

He was good to watch and knew how to talk, but in boxing terms he wasn't the greatest that ever was or ever will be, as some make out. The trilogy against Frazier that he's best remembered for, he lost the first one when they were both in their prime, and very narrowly won the other two when they were both a bit over the hill. I think he claimed to be the greatest so often a lot of people started believing it. He was certainly the vainest, he'd probably be diagnosed with all sorts of narcissistic personality disorders these days.

I'm not saying he was a legend who was actually a bit shit, more over-rated. At least I went there with a 'lege' - not sure half the people cited here could be described as a legend, and at least one I've never heard of.

Author:  Danny's Studs [ Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: "Legends" that are actually a bit shit.

Okay, I accept what you've said but I will disagree. He was v v quick, footwork and head movement was as good as they come. Massive ego but the public lapped it up. I believe he deserves his status.

Author:  KickerConspiracy [ Mon Mar 30, 2015 3:09 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: "Legends" that are actually a bit shit.

O Blue wrote:
Danny's Studs wrote:
O Blue wrote:
#7 Kubrick


genius IMO.


Full Metal Jackat was great and the Shining was decent. Everything else is bad.

I'll add Wes Anderson while I'm at it. His movies are stupid and pointless.


Add M. Night Shyamalan to the shit list.

Author:  South East Citizen [ Mon Mar 30, 2015 3:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: "Legends" that are actually a bit shit.

Danny's Studs wrote:
Okay, I accept what you've said but I will disagree. He was v v quick, footwork and head movement was as good as they come. Massive ego but the public lapped it up. I believe he deserves his status.

I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it.

#21. Voltaire.

Author:  Bert Trautmanns neck brace [ Mon Mar 30, 2015 7:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: "Legends" that are actually a bit shit.

Je pense donc je suis


Descartes

Author:  Jesus O'Nazareth [ Tue Mar 31, 2015 6:17 am ]
Post subject:  Re: "Legends" that are actually a bit shit.

#23 Stevie Wonder.

Srsly anything?

Author:  KickerConspiracy [ Tue Mar 31, 2015 1:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: "Legends" that are actually a bit shit.

Jesus O'Nazareth wrote:
#23 Stevie Wonder.

Srsly anything?


Ebony and Ivory?

#World peace.

Page 2 of 4 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/