Manchester City Forums

Me and the missus went there every morning and ended up getting tanked up on warm mead by about 10.30. Very enjoyable. A man with a bugle played a little tune from the clock tower at the turn of every hour, which was nice. We also saw a tramp play the whole 8 minutes of stairway to heaven on glasses of water.

_________________
tbf.

Beautiful place, drove all over Germany. Loved it. They've got class on the whole ze Germans.

Yeah, and then when you don't go to the wedding, you can be like "Oh yeah, his wife didn't make it..." and then choke up with tears. She won't ask you any questions after that

Right, I don't have either a passport or any money at the moment, but you give me two months and we can have our romantic break away. It's a date, yeah x

_________________

He sounds like he'd struggle to watch a full film in a sitting. Did their relationship start when she was assigned as his carer?

_________________

cars? fucking cars?

ok, not fucking cars, unless you want the old joke about the paddy and the princess

cars bore me. am i subnormal? they don't elicit joy or envy or anything approaching sexual pleasure. am i broken? do i have to get a box set of top gear, a jeremy clarkson mask and a tub of lube to appreciate the whole car thing?

tbf, i would do that anyway

_________________
'Fabio, the round thing there is the ball'

Aguero

I agree..........and I'm in the industry.

_________________
Joeyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

A while back one of mates was showing me his new car. I nodded approvingly. He flipped open the bonnet and nodded at the engine with a big grin on his face. I nodded back. Next, there was a lengthy silence.

"What the fuck am I supposed to be looking at" I finally said.

_________________
And put on that wig I bought you. No, no, no, no. The reddish-brown one.

Umm I think it's just an effete response borne of our small islander mentality towards class and expecting to hate everything and be middle class.

I think anything that has been designed/made well can have an intrinsic beauty, be it a lady, a building, a car, whatever. I bought a hammer the other day to attack women with in the local park and the handle is made of the most pleasing bit of maple wood it looks and feels amazing.

The church by us is a beautiful building here is a picture, I like to look at it at night, from the park.

I don't care for stats and specs with cars but I think some look beautiful.

It's an extra string to my bow is all.

??

It's a horse metaphor, although he hasn't explicitly mentioned horses.

You don't understand anything do you? You're like a dog with a keyboard. A dog that can read and type and stuff, but your frame of reference is so out of whack you have no real understanding of what's going on.

_________________

He's right. I tried to go with dogs the second time cos I thought it'd be closer to home

_________________

I'll tell you what i don't understand. In the last few days you seem to have become somewhat bolshie, and your levels of bollox talking to myself in particular, have become strange to say the least.

If i were you, go to the doctors because you might have tumour growing on the brain, that's making you come out with nonsensical mutterings like you have been doing over recent times.

I've also never known any dog that can read or type and stuff.

What about a monkey?

not recently.

OK, I'm willing to consider the proposed thought experiment referenced above. I think we can agree that the rules of grammar dictate that the opening proposition (underlined) sets up the parameters in which one should contextualise the remainder of your hypothetical situation. In the opening proposition, you suggest that you (1) are taking the position of MRAMB (2) - this seems fairly obvious. However, this role-reversal has the effect that any reference to MRAMB (real-life) in the remainder of your hypothetical exercise should be referred to as 'I', not 'you', as you (real-life Bassy) have taken the position of MRAMB (hypothetical). The effect of this is that the remaining references to 'you' (3)(4)(5) have an unclear subject. It is proposed that because your hypothetical scenario is taking place in the context of a continuing conflict between you (real-life Bassy) and MRAMB (real-life) that any reference to 'you' (3)(4)(5) in the remainder of the thought experiment most likely refers to a hypothetical 'you'; as we have established that 'I' would represent MRAMB (hypothetical), it is implied that 'you' must represent you (hypothetical Bassy). If that is the case, which your opening parameters to the thought experiment (underlined) would certainly suggest, then I must praise you for your clear sense of (real) self-awareness that you would offer such (hypothetical) advice to yourself. It is respectfully submitted however that posting inane nonsense is not actually a symptom of a brain tumour, and so your self-diagnosis is most likely incorrect.

I believe I have accurately considered your hypothetical scenario, however I am of the opinion that you could have perhaps made the experiment clearer as it required far more linguistic reasoning than is normally required when one is asked to consider such a scenario.

I thought it was taking you a while to reply, now i know why.

I managed to read the first sentence of that, just.

_________________
tbf.

Darlo if I were you, then I (you) would be pretty pleased with yourself (iself). But as you and not I am you I can't really comment on it (him).

Congratulations to both of us!